Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Wilson, Janet A, O'Hara, James, Fouweather, Tony, Homer, Tara, Stocken, Deborah D, Vale, Luke, Haighton, Catherine, Rousseau, Nikki, Wilson, Rebecca, McSweeney, Lorraine, Wilkes, Scott, Morrison, Jill, MacKenzie, Kenneth, Ah-See, Kim, Carrie, Sean, Hopkins, Claire, Howe, Nicola, Hussain, Musheer, Mehanna, Hisham, Raine, Christopher, Sullivan, Frank, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Alexander and Teare, M Dawn (2023) Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 401 (10393). pp. 211-2059. ISSN 1474-547X

Item Type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tonsillectomy is regularly performed in adults with acute tonsillitis, but with scarce evidence. A reduction in tonsillectomies has coincided with an increase in acute adult hospitalisation for tonsillitis complications. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative management versus tonsillectomy in patients with recurrent acute tonsillitis.

METHODS

This pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 27 hospitals in the UK. Participants were adults aged 16 years or older who were newly referred to secondary care otolaryngology clinics with recurrent acute tonsillitis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tonsillectomy or conservative management using random permuted blocks of variable length. Stratification by recruiting centre and baseline symptom severity was assessed using the Tonsil Outcome Inventory-14 score (categories defined as mild 0-35, moderate 36-48, or severe 49-70). Participants in the tonsillectomy group received elective surgery to dissect the palatine tonsils within 8 weeks after random assignment and those in the conservative management group received standard non-surgical care during 24 months. The primary outcome was the number of sore throat days collected during 24 months after random assignment, reported once per week with a text message. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, 55284102.

FINDINGS

Between May 11, 2015, and April 30, 2018, 4165 participants with recurrent acute tonsillitis were assessed for eligibility and 3712 were excluded. 453 eligible participants were randomly assigned (233 in the immediate tonsillectomy group vs 220 in the conservative management group). 429 (95%) patients were included in the primary ITT analysis (224 vs 205). The median age of participants was 23 years (IQR 19-30), with 355 (78%) females and 97 (21%) males. Most participants were White (407 [90%]). Participants in the immediate tonsillectomy group had fewer days of sore throat during 24 months than those in the conservative management group (median 23 days [IQR 11-46] vs 30 days [14-65]). After adjustment for site and baseline severity, the incident rate ratio of total sore throat days in the immediate tonsillectomy group (n=224) compared with the conservative management group (n=205) was 0·53 (95% CI 0·43 to 0·65; <0·0001). 191 adverse events in 90 (39%) of 231 participants were deemed related to tonsillectomy. The most common adverse event was bleeding (54 events in 44 [19%] participants). No deaths occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with conservative management, immediate tonsillectomy is clinically effective and cost-effective in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA)_ a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

More Information

Related URLs:
Depositing User: Scott Wilkes

Identifiers

Item ID: 17524
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(23)00519-6
ISSN: 1474-547X
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/17524
Official URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/...

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Scott Wilkes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-7711

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2024 12:33
Last Modified: 08 Apr 2024 12:45

Contributors

Author: Scott Wilkes ORCID iD
Author: Janet A Wilson
Author: James O'Hara
Author: Tony Fouweather
Author: Tara Homer
Author: Deborah D Stocken
Author: Luke Vale
Author: Catherine Haighton
Author: Nikki Rousseau
Author: Rebecca Wilson
Author: Lorraine McSweeney
Author: Jill Morrison
Author: Kenneth MacKenzie
Author: Kim Ah-See
Author: Sean Carrie
Author: Claire Hopkins
Author: Nicola Howe
Author: Musheer Hussain
Author: Hisham Mehanna
Author: Christopher Raine
Author: Frank Sullivan
Author: Alexander von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Author: M Dawn Teare

University Divisions

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing

Subjects

Sciences

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item