Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales to Detect Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Yemm, Heather, Robinson, Dame Louise, Paddick, Stella-Maria, Dotchin, Catherine, Goodson, Michaela Louise, Narytnyk, Alla, Poole, Marie and Mc Ardle, Ríona (2021) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales to Detect Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. pp. 1-24. ISSN 1875-8908

[img]
Preview
PDF
13810.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (452kB) | Preview

Search Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The largest proportion of people with dementia worldwide live in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), with dementia prevalence continuing to rise. Assessment and diagnosis of dementia involves identifying the impact of cognitive decline on function, usually measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Objective: This review aimed to identify IADL measures which are specifically developed, validated, or adapted for use in LMICs to guide selection of such tools. Methods: A systematic search was conducted (fourteen databases) up to April 2020. Only studies reporting on development, validation, or adaptation of IADL measures for dementia or cognitive impairment among older adults (aged over 50) in LMICs were included. The QUADAS 2 was used to assess quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Results: 22 papers met inclusion criteria; identifying 19 discrete IADL tools across 11 LMICs. These were either translated from IADL measures used in high-income countries (n = 6), translated and adapted for cultural differences (n = 6), or newly developed for target LMIC populations (n = 7). Seven measures were investigated in multiple studies; overall quality of diagnostic accuracy was moderate to good. Conclusion: Reliability, validity, and accuracy of IADL measures for supporting dementia diagnosis within LMICs was reported. Key components to consider when selecting an IADL tool for such settings were highlighted, including choosing culturally appropriate, time-efficient tools that account for gender- and literacy-bias, and can be conducted by any volunteer with appropriate training. There is a need for greater technical and external validation of IADL tools across different regions, countries, populations, and cultures.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ** From Crossref journal articles via Jisc Publications Router ** History: ppub 27-07-2021; issued 27-07-2021.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Clinical Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of Nursing and Health Sciences
SWORD Depositor: Publication Router
Depositing User: Publication Router
Date Deposited: 16 Aug 2021 10:51
Last Modified: 16 Aug 2021 11:00
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/13810
ORCID for Heather Yemm: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-0852

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year