Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study

Widera, P, Welsing, Paco M.J., Danso, S. O, Peelen, Sjaak, Kloppenburg, Margreet, Loef, Marieke, Marijnissen, Anne C., van Helvoort, Eefje M., Blanco, Franciso J., Magalhães, Joanna, Berenbaum, Francis, Haugen, Ida K., Bay-Jensen, Anne-Christine, Mobasheri, Ali, Ladel, Christoph, Loughlin, John, Lafeber, Floris P.J.G., Lalande, Agnès, Larkin, Jonathan, Weinans, Harrie and Jaume, Baccardit (2023) Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 5 (4). p. 100406. ISSN 2665-9131

Item Type: Article

Abstract

Objectives

To efficiently assess the disease-modifying potential of new osteoarthritis treatments, clinical trials need progression-enriched patient populations. To assess whether the application of machine learning results in patient selection enrichment, we developed a machine learning recruitment strategy targeting progressive patients and validated it in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis prospective study.
Design

We designed a two-stage recruitment process supported by machine learning models trained to rank candidates by the likelihood of progression. First stage models used data from pre-existing cohorts to select patients for a screening visit. The second stage model used screening data to inform the final inclusion. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated using the actual 24-month progression.
Results

From 3500 candidate patients, 433 with knee osteoarthritis were screened, 297 were enrolled, and 247 completed the 2-year follow-up visit. We observed progression related to pain (P, 30%), structure (S, 13%), and combined pain and structure (P ​+ ​S, 5%), and a proportion of non-progressors (N, 52%) ∼15% lower vs an unenriched population. Our model predicted these outcomes with AUC of 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81–0.90] for pain-related progression and AUC of 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52–0.70] for structure-related progression. Progressors were ranked higher than non-progressors for P ​+ ​S (median rank 65 vs 143, AUC = 0.75), P (median rank 77 vs 143, AUC = 0.71), and S patients (median rank 107 vs 143, AUC = 0.57).
Conclusions

The machine learning-supported recruitment resulted in enriched selection of progressive patients. Further research is needed to improve structural progression prediction and assess this strategy in an interventional trial.

[img]
Preview
PDF
1-s2.0-S2665913123000730-main.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

More Information

Depositing User: Sam Danso

Identifiers

Item ID: 17014
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100406
ISSN: 2665-9131
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/17014
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

Users with ORCIDS

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2024 12:42
Last Modified: 19 Sep 2024 12:42

Contributors

Author: P Widera
Author: Paco M.J. Welsing
Author: S. O Danso
Author: Sjaak Peelen
Author: Margreet Kloppenburg
Author: Marieke Loef
Author: Anne C. Marijnissen
Author: Eefje M. van Helvoort
Author: Franciso J. Blanco
Author: Joanna Magalhães
Author: Francis Berenbaum
Author: Ida K. Haugen
Author: Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen
Author: Ali Mobasheri
Author: Christoph Ladel
Author: John Loughlin
Author: Floris P.J.G. Lafeber
Author: Agnès Lalande
Author: Jonathan Larkin
Author: Harrie Weinans
Author: Baccardit Jaume

University Divisions

Faculty of Technology > School of Computer Science

Subjects

Sciences > Health Sciences
Computing

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)