Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study
Widera, P, Welsing, Paco M.J., Danso, S. O, Peelen, Sjaak, Kloppenburg, Margreet, Loef, Marieke, Marijnissen, Anne C., van Helvoort, Eefje M., Blanco, Franciso J., Magalhães, Joanna, Berenbaum, Francis, Haugen, Ida K., Bay-Jensen, Anne-Christine, Mobasheri, Ali, Ladel, Christoph, Loughlin, John, Lafeber, Floris P.J.G., Lalande, Agnès, Larkin, Jonathan, Weinans, Harrie and Jaume, Baccardit (2023) Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 5 (4). p. 100406. ISSN 2665-9131
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Abstract
Objectives
To efficiently assess the disease-modifying potential of new osteoarthritis treatments, clinical trials need progression-enriched patient populations. To assess whether the application of machine learning results in patient selection enrichment, we developed a machine learning recruitment strategy targeting progressive patients and validated it in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis prospective study.
Design
We designed a two-stage recruitment process supported by machine learning models trained to rank candidates by the likelihood of progression. First stage models used data from pre-existing cohorts to select patients for a screening visit. The second stage model used screening data to inform the final inclusion. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated using the actual 24-month progression.
Results
From 3500 candidate patients, 433 with knee osteoarthritis were screened, 297 were enrolled, and 247 completed the 2-year follow-up visit. We observed progression related to pain (P, 30%), structure (S, 13%), and combined pain and structure (P + S, 5%), and a proportion of non-progressors (N, 52%) ∼15% lower vs an unenriched population. Our model predicted these outcomes with AUC of 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81–0.90] for pain-related progression and AUC of 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52–0.70] for structure-related progression. Progressors were ranked higher than non-progressors for P + S (median rank 65 vs 143, AUC = 0.75), P (median rank 77 vs 143, AUC = 0.71), and S patients (median rank 107 vs 143, AUC = 0.57).
Conclusions
The machine learning-supported recruitment resulted in enriched selection of progressive patients. Further research is needed to improve structural progression prediction and assess this strategy in an interventional trial.
|
PDF
1-s2.0-S2665913123000730-main.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (1MB) | Preview |
More Information
Depositing User: Sam Danso |
Identifiers
Item ID: 17014 |
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100406 |
ISSN: 2665-9131 |
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/17014 | Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/... |
Users with ORCIDS
Catalogue record
Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2024 12:42 |
Last Modified: 19 Sep 2024 12:42 |
Author: | P Widera |
Author: | Paco M.J. Welsing |
Author: | S. O Danso |
Author: | Sjaak Peelen |
Author: | Margreet Kloppenburg |
Author: | Marieke Loef |
Author: | Anne C. Marijnissen |
Author: | Eefje M. van Helvoort |
Author: | Franciso J. Blanco |
Author: | Joanna Magalhães |
Author: | Francis Berenbaum |
Author: | Ida K. Haugen |
Author: | Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen |
Author: | Ali Mobasheri |
Author: | Christoph Ladel |
Author: | John Loughlin |
Author: | Floris P.J.G. Lafeber |
Author: | Agnès Lalande |
Author: | Jonathan Larkin |
Author: | Harrie Weinans |
Author: | Baccardit Jaume |
University Divisions
Faculty of Technology > School of Computer ScienceSubjects
Sciences > Health SciencesComputing
Actions (login required)
View Item (Repository Staff Only) |