Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

An Inexpensive Retrospective Standard Setting Method Based on Item Facilities

McLachlan, John C, Robertson, K. Alex, Weller, Bridget and Sawdon, Marina (2020) An Inexpensive Retrospective Standard Setting Method Based on Item Facilities. BMC Medical Education. ISSN 1472-6920 (Submitted)

Item Type: Article

Abstract

Abstract Background Standard setting is one of the most challenging aspects of assessment in high-stakes healthcare settings. The Angoff methodology is widely used, but poses a number of challenges, including conceptualisation of the just-passing candidate, and the time-cost of implementing the method. Cohen methodologies are inexpensive and rapid but rely on the performance of an individual candidate. A new method of standard setting, based on the entire cohort and every item, would be valuable. Methods We identified Borderline candidates by reviewing their performance across all assessments in an academic year. We plotted the item scores of the Borderline candidates in comparison with Facility for the whole cohort and fitted curves to the resulting distribution. Results We propose that for any given Item, an equation of the form y ≈ C.e Fx where y is the Facility of Borderline candidates on that Item, x is the observed Item Facility of the whole cohort, and C and F are constants, predicts the probable Facility for Borderline candidates over the test, in other words, the cut score for Borderline candidates. We describe ways of estimating C and F in any given circumstance, and suggest typical values arising from this particular study: that C = 12.3 and F = 0.021. Conclusions We propose that C and F are relatively stable, and that the equation y = 12.3.e 0.021x can rapidly be applied to the item Facility for every item. The average value represents the cut score for the assessment as a whole. This represents a novel retrospective method based on test takers. Compared to the Cohen method which draws on one score and one candidate, this method draws on all items and candidates in a test. It can be used to standard set a whole test, or a particular item where the predicted Angoff score is very different from the observed Facility.

Full text not available from this repository.

More Information

Depositing User: Leah Maughan

Identifiers

Item ID: 12751
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-38272/v1
ISSN: 1472-6920
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/12751
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-38272/v1

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Marina Sawdon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8668-257X

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2020 11:05
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2020 11:05

Contributors

Author: Marina Sawdon ORCID iD
Author: John C McLachlan
Author: K. Alex Robertson
Author: Bridget Weller

University Divisions

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of Nursing and Health Sciences

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)