The PROCAN-B Study Protocol: Early diagnosis of PROstate CANcer for Black men - a community-centred participatory approach in Scotland and the North-East of England
Christie-de Jong, Floor, Eberhardt, Judith, Ling, Jonathan, Kotzur, Marie, Oyeniyi, Olugbenga Sam, Nnyanzi, Lawrence, Kabuye, John, Kalemba, Martin and Robb, Katie (2024) The PROCAN-B Study Protocol: Early diagnosis of PROstate CANcer for Black men - a community-centred participatory approach in Scotland and the North-East of England. PLOSONE. ISSN 1932-6203 (In Press)
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the UK and Black African-Caribbean men are twice as likely to develop prostate cancer as white men. These cancer inequalities need urgent tackling. Barriers to early diagnosis are complex and require complex solutions. Culturally-tailored, community-centred and participatory approaches show promise in tackling cancer inequalities. We aim to co-design a culturally appropriate intervention to tackle barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer for Black men in Scotland and the North-East of England using a community-centred participatory approach.
Methods
The PROCAN-B study is a mixed methods study set in Scotland and the North-East of England. A Public Involvement and Community Engagement (PICE) group (n=12), is involved at every step of the research. Drawing on principles of the Integrated Screening Action model (I-SAM), the study has 8 objectives: 1) to explore barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer among Black men (45+) through focus groups (n=12); 2) to co-design a culturally acceptable peer-led intervention to tackle barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer in Black men; 3) to train members of the community as ‘peer-facilitators’ (n=8); 4) to deliver the intervention in each location, facilitated by peer-facilitators, with a purposive sample (n=20) of Black men (45+); 5) to qualitatively evaluate the intervention through focus groups; 6) to refine the intervention based on qualitative feedback; 7) to pilot the refined intervention with another purposive sample (n=40) through a cross-sectional survey pre- and post-intervention; 8) to qualitatively evaluate the refined intervention through focus groups to further refine the intervention.
|
PDF
PONE-D-23-32907R1_FTC.pdf Download (358kB) | Preview |
More Information
Additional Information: the acceptance email indicates a strict embargo until 2pm on the day of publication, however I do not have a date of publication. Therefore, I have set this on the 1st of April 2025 for now. |
Depositing User: Floor Christie |
Identifiers
Item ID: 18581 |
ISSN: 1932-6203 |
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/18581 |
Users with ORCIDS
Catalogue record
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2024 16:03 |
Last Modified: 18 Dec 2024 16:15 |
Author: | Floor Christie-de Jong |
Author: | Jonathan Ling |
Author: | Marie Kotzur |
Author: | Katie Robb |
Author: | Judith Eberhardt |
Author: | Olugbenga Sam Oyeniyi |
Author: | Lawrence Nnyanzi |
Author: | John Kabuye |
Author: | Martin Kalemba |
University Divisions
Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of MedicineSubjects
Sciences > Health SciencesActions (login required)
View Item (Repository Staff Only) |