The PROCAN-B Study Protocol: Early diagnosis of PROstate CANcer for Black men - a community-centred participatory approach in Scotland and the North-East of England
Christie-De Jong, Floor, Eberhardt, Judith, Ling, Jonathan, Kotzur, Marie, Oyeniyi, Olugbenga Sam, Nnyanzi, Lawrence, Kabuye, John, Kalemba, Martin and Robb, Katie (2024) The PROCAN-B Study Protocol: Early diagnosis of PROstate CANcer for Black men - a community-centred participatory approach in Scotland and the North-East of England. PLOSONE, 19 (12). ISSN 1932-6203
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|
Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the UK and Black African-Caribbean men are twice as likely to develop prostate cancer as white men. These cancer inequalities need urgent tackling. Barriers to early diagnosis are complex and require complex solutions. Culturally-tailored, community-centred and participatory approaches show promise in tackling cancer inequalities. We aim to co-design a culturally appropriate intervention to tackle barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer for Black men in Scotland and the North-East of England using a community-centred participatory approach.
Methods
The PROCAN-B study is a mixed methods study set in Scotland and the North-East of England. A Public Involvement and Community Engagement (PICE) group (n=12), is involved at every step of the research. Drawing on principles of the Integrated Screening Action model (I-SAM), the study has 8 objectives: 1) to explore barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer among Black men (45+) through focus groups (n=12); 2) to co-design a culturally acceptable peer-led intervention to tackle barriers to early diagnosis of prostate cancer in Black men; 3) to train members of the community as ‘peer-facilitators’ (n=8); 4) to deliver the intervention in each location, facilitated by peer-facilitators, with a purposive sample (n=20) of Black men (45+); 5) to qualitatively evaluate the intervention through focus groups; 6) to refine the intervention based on qualitative feedback; 7) to pilot the refined intervention with another purposive sample (n=40) through a cross-sectional survey pre- and post-intervention; 8) to qualitatively evaluate the refined intervention through focus groups to further refine the intervention.
| Preview | PDF journal.pone.0315288.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview | 
| Preview | PDF PONE-D-23-32907R1_FTC.pdf Download (358kB) | Preview | 
More Information
| Uncontrolled Keywords: Prostate cancer, Cancer detection and diagnosis, Cancer risk factors, behavioral and social aspects of health, Cancer screening, England, Scotland, Community based intervention. | 
| Depositing User: Floor Christie-De Jong | 
Identifiers
| Item ID: 18581 | 
| Identification Number: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315288 | 
| ISSN: 1932-6203 | 
| URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/18581 | Official URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.13... | 
Users with ORCIDS
Catalogue record
| Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2024 16:03 | 
| Last Modified: 13 Aug 2025 10:41 | 
| Author: | Floor Christie-De Jong   | 
| Author: | Jonathan Ling   | 
| Author: | Marie Kotzur   | 
| Author: | Katie Robb   | 
| Author: | Judith Eberhardt | 
| Author: | Olugbenga Sam Oyeniyi | 
| Author: | Lawrence Nnyanzi | 
| Author: | John Kabuye | 
| Author: | Martin Kalemba | 
University Divisions
Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of MedicineSubjects
Sciences > Health SciencesActions (login required)
    |  | View Item (Repository Staff Only) | 
 
 