What are you looking for today?

Leggett, Zach (2022) One step forward, two steps back: The Court of Appeal for Ontario clarifies Canada’s sex work laws but ultimately delivers a blow in attempts to challenge the constitutional validity of Canada’s ‘end demand’ model. R v NS, 2022 ONCA 160. The Journal of Criminal Law, 86 (5). pp. 377-383. ISSN 1740-5580

Document

Abstract

Abstract

R v NS, 2022 ONCA 160 is the latest decision on the constitutional validity of Canada's sex work laws which were introduced to the Canadian Criminal Code through the Protecting Communities and Exploited Persons Act 2014. Since the decision in Canada v Bedford 2013, SCC 72, where the previous sex work laws were declared unconstitutional, the Canadian Parliament passed legislation which introduced an 'end demand' model of regulation. Arguments in the
Canadian courts that the new law creates dangerous working conditions and risks the safety and security of sex workers have brought mixed results. In their latest decision, the Court of Appeal of Ontario has dismissed these concerns and declared legal provisions under the Canadian Criminal Code which criminalise the purchase of sex and surrounding activities are not overbroad or grossly disproportionate and
therefore do not infringe the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: freedom of security, prostitution, sex work, end demand, human rights
Depositing User: Zach Leggett
URI: https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/14952

Further Details

More Information

Uncontrolled Keywords
freedom of security, prostitution, sex work, end demand, human rights
Depositing User

Identifiers

Item ID
14952
Identification Number
ISSN
1740-5580

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Zach Leggett

Catalogue record

Date Deposited
01 Aug 2022 09:39
Last Modified
16 Jul 2025 10:47

Contributors

Author
Zach Leggett

University Divisions

Subjects

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only)

Downloads per month over past year