What are you looking for today?

Clark, Joseph, Copsey, Bethan, Wright-Hughes, Alexandra, McNaught, Emma, Bijsterveld, Petra, McCormack, Terry, Foy, Robbie, Wilkes, Scott, Dickson, Jon Mark, Meads, David, Farrin, Amanda and Johnson, Miriam (2022) Cancer patients' needs assessment in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), economic evaluation and normalisation process theory evaluation of the needs assessment tool cancer (CANAssess). BMJ open, 12 (5). p. 211. ISSN 2044-6055

Document

Abstract

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unmet needs in patients with cancer and their carers are common but poorly identified and addressed. The Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) is a structured consultation guide to identify and triage patient and carer unmet needs. The NAT-C is validated, but its effectiveness in reducing unmet patient and carer needs in primary care is unknown.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Cluster randomised controlled trial with internal pilot and embedded process evaluation to test the clinical and cost effectiveness of the NAT-C in primary care for people with active cancer in reducing unmet patient and carer need, compared with usual care. We will recruit 1080 patients with active cancer (and carers if relevant) from 54 general practices in England.Participating practices will be randomised 1:1 to either deliver an NAT-guided clinical consultation plus usual care or to usual care alone. Consenting participants with active cancer and their carers (if nominated) will be asked to complete study questionnaires at baseline, 1 and 3 months for all, 6 months except for those recruited outside of the last 3 months of recruitment, and attend an NAT-C appointment if allocated to an intervention practice. An internal pilot will assess: site and participant recruitment, intervention uptake and follow-up rates. The primary outcome, the proportion of patients with an unmet need on the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 at 3 months postregistration, will be analysed using a multilevel logistic regression. Mixed-methods process evaluation informed by Normalisation Process Theory will use quantitative survey and interview data from clinicians and key stakeholders in cancer care to develop an implementation strategy for nationwide rollout of the NAT-C if the intervention is cost-effective.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval from London-Surrey REC (20/LO/0312). Results will be peer-reviewed, published and made available to research participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN15497400.

Item Type: Article
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Scott Wilkes
URI: https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/17534

Further Details

More Information

Identifiers

Item ID
17534
Identification Number
ISSN
2044-6055

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Scott Wilkes

Catalogue record

Date Deposited
08 Apr 2024 13:49
Last Modified
04 Jun 2025 16:16

Contributors

Author
Joseph Clark
Author
Bethan Copsey
Author
Alexandra Wright-Hughes
Author
Emma McNaught
Author
Petra Bijsterveld
Author
Terry McCormack
Author
Robbie Foy
Author
Jon Mark Dickson
Author
David Meads
Author
Amanda Farrin
Author
Miriam Johnson

University Divisions

Subjects

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only)

Downloads per month over past year