Clyde, Danielle, Grant, Callum, Canales, Juan Andres Aguiar, Adib, Reza, Baig, Sarfaraz, Bhasker, Aparna G, Cameron, David, Catalin, Copaescu, Clare, Ken, de Beaux, Andrew, Drummond, Gillian, Fawal, Hayssam, Fried, Martin, Graham, Yitka, Goel, Ramen, Goodpaster, Kasey, Hazebroek, Eric, Hopkins, George, Husain, Farah, Jatana, Anita, Joyce, Brian, Kermansaravi, Mohammad, Kothari, Shanu, Kow, Lillian, Leite, Silvia, Madhok, Brij, Mahon, David, Miller, Karl, Miras, Alex, Moize, Violeta, Neto, Manoel G, Nimeri, Abdelrahman, O'Kane, Mary, Peterli, Ralph, Poggi, Luis, Ratcliffe, Denise, Sakran, Nasser, Salminen, Paulina, Sarkar, Rupa, Shenfine, Jon, Singhal, Rishi, Sogg, Stephanie, Stenberg, Erik, Suter, Michel, Taha, Safwan, Tahrani, Abd, Vilallonga, Ramon, Voon, Kelvin, Welbourn, Richard, Zerrweck, Carlos, Moussa, Osama, Byrne, James, Lamb, Peter, Parmar, Chetan, Ghanem, Omar, Mahawar, Kamal K, Robertson, Andrew G N and Yang, Wah (2025) Global Variations in Practices after Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery; the PARTNER Study. Obesity surgery, 35. pp. 5357-5378. ISSN 1708-0428
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Abstract
With over 1 billion individuals affected globally, obesity and obesity related diseases is now a leading cause of death. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has emerged as a cornerstone intervention for severe obesity and its associated comorbidities. Despite its efficacy, postoperative care and follow-up after MBS remains highly variable worldwide. The PARTNER study aimed to evaluate global clinical practices in the postoperative management following MBS by surveying multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. This study was an international online survey conducted between October 2024 and January 2025. A multidisciplinary team developed the questionnaire based on existing literature and international guidelines. The survey assessed five domains: follow-up care, postoperative treatment, dietary management, patient support, and measurement of surgical outcomes. Responses were analysed descriptively. A total of 262 responses were received from 62 countries. Most respondents were bariatric surgeons (72.1%) working in public healthcare systems (73.3%). While 78.7% reported conducting three-month postoperative reviews, only 23.7% offered indefinite follow-up. Hybrid models of care (virtual and in-person) were common (56.9%). VTE prophylaxis and postoperative PPI use were recommended by 64.1% and 84.3% respectively. Nearly all respondents (98.1%) provided dietary advice, with protein and micronutrient supplementation widely endorsed. Only 56.1% routinely referred patients for psychological follow-up. Definitions of surgical success and failure varied widely, with inconsistent objective outcome measures. The PARTNER study reveals significant international variation in postoperative management practices following MBS. These findings underscore the need for more standardized, evidence-based guidelines to improve long-term outcomes and equity of care worldwide. [Abstract copyright: © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.]
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | ** From PubMed via Jisc Publications Router ** History: received 29-05-2025; revised 05-06-2025; accepted 22-10-2025. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Follow-up, Postoperative care, Bariatric and metabolic surgery |
| SWORD Depositor: | Publication Router |
| Depositing User: | Yitka Graham |
| URI: | https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/19696 |
Dimensions
Dimensions