Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making

Kanu, Chisom, Abel, Jessica L., Knight, Sarah L., Williamson, Nicola, Ho, Calvin N., Rodriguez-Leboeuf, Ana Maria, Carmichael, Chloe, Wac, Katarzyna, Herzog, Rainer, Vallow, Susan, Oberdhan, Dorothee, Kaneyasu, Takako and Chassany, Olivier (2026) Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 10 (1): 71. p. 71. ISSN 2509-8020

Item Type: Article

Abstract

Patient experience data (PED) encompass information on patient’s experiences, disease impact, and treatment preferences. PED are critical inputs to the drug development process and help ensure medicines are developed with the interests of patients in mind. The authors (all members of the Industry Special Interest Group and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement Special Interest Group of the International Society for Quality of Life Research) have conducted a scoping review of how regulatory agencies, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, private payers, clinicians, and patients currently use PED for decision-making. Recommendations are provided to address key challenges influencing multi-stakeholder use of PED.

[thumbnail of 41687_2026_Article_1030.pdf] PDF
41687_2026_Article_1030.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

More Information

Additional Information: ** Article version: VoR ** From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router ** History: received 19-03-2025; accepted 22-02-2026; registration 23-02-2026; epub 24-03-2026; online 24-03-2026; version-of-record 04-05-2026; collection 01-12-2026. ** Licence for VoR version of this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ** Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Robyn Carson, Ashley Slagle, Wen-Hung Chen, and ISOQOL Board of Directors. Contributions were made to this manuscript by members of the ISOQOL Industry and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement (R&HE) SIGs. It does not necessarily reflect the views of ISOQOL, the Industry SIG, the R&HE SIG or ISOQOL Leadership. The purpose of the Industry SIG is to connect individuals from academia with professionals representing the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consulting industries who share a common interest in the application of health related QOL research. We are interested in innovative methods and research related to COAs, including PROs. The purpose of the R&HE SIG is to routinely and actively engage with regulatory agencies and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies to address critical applied measurement issues raised by these entities or that emerge from their public communications (e.g., guidance documents, reflection papers, workshops). This collaboration embraces a broad measurement perspective and enables us to build scientifically-based patient-focused recommendations regarding the use of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in the evaluation of therapeutic interventions aimed at advancing human health and well-being. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) is a global community of researchers, clinicians, health care professionals, industry professionals, consultants, and patient research partners advancing health related quality of life research (HRQL). Together, we are creating a future in which patient perspective is integral to health research, care and policy.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Patient engagement, Drug regulation, Health technology assessment, Patient experience data
Related URLs:
SWORD Depositor: Publication Router
Depositing User: Publication Router

Identifiers

Item ID: 20207
Identification Number: 10.1186/s41687-026-01030-3
ISSN: 2509-8020
URI: https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/20207

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Chisom Kanu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-8652
ORCID for Jessica L. Abel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0007-2971-3855
ORCID for Sarah L. Knight: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-3476-3991
ORCID for Nicola Williamson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0003-1873-5312
ORCID for Calvin N. Ho: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-9651
ORCID for Ana Maria Rodriguez-Leboeuf: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-3223
ORCID for Chloe Carmichael: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-2176
ORCID for Katarzyna Wac: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-399X
ORCID for Rainer Herzog: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0000-3640-4160
ORCID for Susan Vallow: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-7632
ORCID for Dorothee Oberdhan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-9049
ORCID for Takako Kaneyasu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-3680
ORCID for Olivier Chassany: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-5809

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 23 May 2026 14:32
Last Modified: 23 May 2026 14:32

Contributors

Author: Chisom Kanu ORCID iD
Author: Jessica L. Abel ORCID iD
Author: Sarah L. Knight ORCID iD
Author: Nicola Williamson ORCID iD
Author: Calvin N. Ho ORCID iD
Author: Ana Maria Rodriguez-Leboeuf ORCID iD
Author: Chloe Carmichael ORCID iD
Author: Katarzyna Wac ORCID iD
Author: Rainer Herzog ORCID iD
Author: Susan Vallow ORCID iD
Author: Dorothee Oberdhan ORCID iD
Author: Takako Kaneyasu ORCID iD
Author: Olivier Chassany ORCID iD

University Divisions

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of Nursing and Health Sciences

Subjects

Sciences > Nursing
Sciences

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)

Downloads per month over past year