Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

How Accurate is Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Paediatric Elbow Fractures presenting to the Emergency Department? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Girdhar, Navvya, McCreary, David, Chan, Nigel, Nedyalokova, Adrianna and Rees, Jon (2026) How Accurate is Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Paediatric Elbow Fractures presenting to the Emergency Department? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Paediatric Emergency Care. ISSN 0749-5161 (In Press)

Item Type: Article

Abstract

Abstract
Objectives
Primary:
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Point of Care Ultrasound for the identification of elbow fractures in paediatric patients.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up until 1st December 2025 for studies involving paediatric patients presenting to the Emergency Department with suspected elbow fractures, who underwent POCUS. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 framework. The primary outcome of interest was the ability of POCUS to accurately detect elbow fractures in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
Results
9 studies were reviewed and included in the meta-analysis encompassing 1444 patients. POCUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% (95% CI 87.9 % - 95.8%) with a specificity of 84.5% (75.4% – 90.7%). Once sample size was accounted for, the estimated heterogeneity between studies was small. The studies analysed were generally of good quality with the reference standard and flow and timing being the
main areas subject to bias.
Conclusions
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the conclusion that POCUS is an effective tool in the diagnosis of paediatric elbow fractures presenting to the ED. Given its high sensitivity, a negative POCUS examination may be used to reliably rule out paediatric elbow fractures where the clinical suspicion is low. The moderately high specificity means that positive findings may require confirmatory radiography in cases where clinical findings are less convincing.

[thumbnail of Revised submission 8.pdf] PDF
Revised submission 8.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

More Information

Depositing User: Jon Rees

Identifiers

Item ID: 20366
ISSN: 0749-5161
URI: https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/20366

Users with ORCIDS

ORCID for Navvya Girdhar: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4683-7231
ORCID for David McCreary: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-6162
ORCID for Nigel Chan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0007-3424-4686
ORCID for Jon Rees: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-244X

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 18 Jun 2026 11:26
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2026 11:26

Contributors

Author: Navvya Girdhar ORCID iD
Author: David McCreary ORCID iD
Author: Nigel Chan ORCID iD
Author: Jon Rees ORCID iD
Author: Adrianna Nedyalokova

University Divisions

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of Psychology

Subjects

Sciences > Health Sciences

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)

Downloads per month over past year