Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

Read like a butterfly, write like a bee, discuss: Evaluating conversation in an integrated circle process in the ESOL classroom

Peters, Sarah (2021) Read like a butterfly, write like a bee, discuss: Evaluating conversation in an integrated circle process in the ESOL classroom. Doctoral thesis, University of Sunderland.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis considers a pedagogy that combined reading circle (Furr, 2009), writing circle (Gunnery, 2007) and community of enquiry (Lipman, 2003), used with adult English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) in the Further Education sector. It investigates the integration of these circle activities and evaluates the impact and potential of this novel ESOL pedagogy. Two cohorts of Entry 3 ESOL students participated in circles that structured collaborative language learning using discussion to build understandings of texts using allocated, rotating roles before producing their own written tasks. The focus on circles as a means of informal communication and learning prompted the research question: How does an integrated circle pedagogy impact the classroom experience? I review types of informal conversation (Sennett, 2012; 2018), dialogic pedagogy (Alexander, 2017) and consider critical responses to dialogic discourse (Burbules, 2007) which inform the synthesis of circle methods. Action research (McNiff, 2014) is the iterative research method I used to evaluate the pedagogical practice. The use of narrative accounts (Connelly & Clandinin, 1990) represents participant experience, whilst quantitative assessment results provides supplementary data. Findings indicate the circle process impacted on the quality of conversation in five areas. It supported participants to pool language knowledge which facilitated reciprocal learning. It supported students to share life experiences which transformed ideas about the wider world in some cases. Collaboration fostered relationship building and this encouraged the development of an independent learning community (Lipman, 2003; Biesta, 2006). Finally, it demonstrated the importance to the role of the teacher as facilitator of balancing controlled support (Stefanou et al., 2004) with freer learning spaces where the autonomy of conversational ‘beginnings’ could emerge (Arendt, 1977; Biesta, 2014). The findings have confirmed tensions in ESOL pedagogy between language accuracy and language fluency. Accuracy features in a data and outputs-led
3
curriculum with teacher controlled practice to develop uniform language skills swiftly. By contrast, fluency brings a slower pace to the classroom but benefits from student-directed discussions to influence classroom activity.
My research into the impact of integrated circles offers a way to explore the dilemmas and opportunities in ESOL pedagogy. It thinks about teaching and learning as a communicative, co-operative experience carefully nurtured and recommends making more time for fluency to contribute to a more rounded language education.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Thesis)
Thesis_SarahPeters.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (8MB) | Preview
[img] Image (JPEG) (RDec1)
RDec_1 15054.jpeg
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (630kB) | Request a copy
[img] Image (JPEG)
RDec_2 15054.jpeg
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (648kB) | Request a copy

More Information

Depositing User: Unnamed user with email leaona.clarkson@sunderland.ac.uk

Identifiers

Item ID: 15054
URI: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/15054

Users with ORCIDS

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2022 16:13
Last Modified: 15 Aug 2022 16:15

Contributors

Author: Sarah Peters

University Divisions

Faculty of Education and Society

Subjects

Education

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)