Close menu

SURE

Sunderland Repository records the research produced by the University of Sunderland including practice-based research and theses.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Alowami, Moaz, Sruthi, Chitrala, Sehrish, Simona, Elamin, Ahmed, Somashekar, Lakshmish Devang Halepalya, Majeed, Salman, Ullah, Shahid, Nath, Priyanka Deb, Tariq, Adeel Bin, Yasir, Muhammad, Shahzad, Muhammad Aamir, Alteneiji, Khalifa Saleh, Babasola, Rhoda Oluwatise, Hashmi, Tallal, Farhan, Muzammil, Gardezi, Syed Anjum and Hayat, Mumtaz (2026) Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. JGH Open, 10 (3): e70349. e70349. ISSN 2397-9070

Item Type: Article

Abstract

Background: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (h‐ESD) has emerged as a modified approach to overcome the technical challenges associated with conventional ESD (c‐ESD). However, evidence comparing their safety and efficacy in colorectal neoplasia remains limited. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to April 2025 for randomized and propensity‐matched studies comparing h‐ESD with c‐ESD for colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was en bloc resection, with secondary outcomes including procedure time, adverse events, bleeding, and perforation. Data synthesis was performed using a random‐effects model in RevMan. Results: Five studies (three RCTs and two propensity‐matched cohorts) involving 1047 participants were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant differences in en bloc resection rates (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.26–1.56; p = 0.33; I2 = 69%) or R0 resection rates (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.44–1.11; p = 0.13; I2 = 24%). h‐ESD was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (WMD = −10.65 min, 95% CI: −14.90 to −6.39; p < 0.01; I2 = 5%). No significant differences were observed for overall adverse events (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.70–1.84), bleeding episodes (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.45–3.65), or bowel perforation (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.54–1.73). Conclusion: Hybrid ESD demonstrated equivalent safety and efficacy to c‐ESD for colorectal neoplasia, with the added advantage of significantly shorter procedure times. Further high‐quality RCTs are needed to validate its role in clinical practice.

[thumbnail of JGH Open - 2026 - Alowami - Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal.pdf]
Preview
PDF
JGH Open - 2026 - Alowami - Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (777kB) | Preview

More Information

Uncontrolled Keywords: hybrid submuscosal dissection, endoscopic dissection, colorectal cancer
Related URLs:
SWORD Depositor: Publication Router
Depositing User: Publication Router

Identifiers

Item ID: 20017
Identification Number: 10.1002/jgh3.70349
ISSN: 2397-9070
URI: https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/20017
Official URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j...

Users with ORCIDS

Catalogue record

Date Deposited: 10 Mar 2026 13:59
Last Modified: 10 Mar 2026 13:59

Contributors

Author: Moaz Alowami
Author: Chitrala Sruthi
Author: Simona Sehrish
Author: Ahmed Elamin
Author: Lakshmish Devang Halepalya Somashekar
Author: Salman Majeed
Author: Shahid Ullah
Author: Priyanka Deb Nath
Author: Adeel Bin Tariq
Author: Muhammad Yasir
Author: Muhammad Aamir Shahzad
Author: Khalifa Saleh Alteneiji
Author: Rhoda Oluwatise Babasola
Author: Tallal Hashmi
Author: Muzammil Farhan
Author: Syed Anjum Gardezi
Author: Mumtaz Hayat

University Divisions

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing > School of Medicine

Subjects

Sciences > Biomedical Sciences

Actions (login required)

View Item (Repository Staff Only) View Item (Repository Staff Only)

Downloads per month over past year